The United State's Senate is scheduled to take its final vote on the Protect College Sports Act (PCSA) this evening. At the same time, power conference leaders are building a fallback plan that would put much of the bill into effect whether or not it becomes law. Below is a summary of where it stand, the legal pushback already forming, and why the House remains the real obstacle.
Where the Bill Stands Today
The PCSA is set for a final Senate vote on Monday evening. It needs at least 51 votes and is expected to pass but the Senate isn't the final step as it will still have hurdles to clear.
Earlier this month, the Senate voted 74-24 to end debate, well above the 60-vote threshold. Based on those procedural votes, at least two-thirds of the chamber is expected to support the bill.
A Senate win does not finish the job. The bill still has to pass the House, and because of the congressional calendar, it is unlikely to get a final vote until after the November midterms. If it does not reach the President's desk before the new Congress is sworn in on Jan. 3, the process starts over.
"Plan B": Conference Self-Governance
Ross Dellenger of Yahoo Sports reports that conference executives and senior school administrators are building a conference-based governance and compensation framework that copies many of the bill's concepts. The main elements are addressed by Yahoo Sports:
A harder cap: Leaders are seriously discussing adopting the bill's $48.8M revenue-share cap and enforcing it more strictly through the College Sports Commission (CSC) by limiting NIL deals from school-affiliated entities. For reference, the Senate bill raised the cap from $21.3M to $48.8M by adding a $22.5M retention pool and a $5M pool reserved for non-revenue sports.
Closing the sponsor loophole: Right now, schools exceed the cap by routing NIL deals through school-affiliated corporate sponsors and apparel brands by directing sponsorship money for scoreboards, programs, the radio network that would typically go to the institution to the student-athlete instead. Most power conference programs are spending well over $30M in total athlete compensation.
League-only rules: Conferences are also discussing their own agent registry with a fee cap and a transfer limit, both of which could be tested in court by agents and players on the basis that the conferences are colluding against them.
The deadline is the January portal: ADs describe players and agents negotiating new deals right now, before anyone knows what the compensation rules will be. The SEC has pushed hardest toward self-governance, on the theory that governing a smaller group of schools reduces legal exposure compared with the NCAA, which holds market power.
CSC Enforcement is tightening
The CSC's Sept. 9 report showed nearly 500 deals denied from July 1 to Aug. 31, worth $67M. That exceeds the combined denied value of the previous four months. Over the same period, it cleared more than 12,000 deals worth over $225M. Plaintiff attorneys Kessler and Berman have requested documents from the CSC because they believe it is denying deals that should be approved.
Plaintiffs' Counsel Is Already Pushing Back
Steve Berman, co-lead counsel in House, is drawing a firm line: "There is no cap on the amount of NIL deals. We would not agree to change that." On a conference-built cap, he says it is "not possible without our permission," and that Judge Wilken "would be very suspicious of conference-generated changes, in particular the cap."
There is some room to maneuver:
Berman said he is willing to raise the cap within the settlement as long as it stays a soft cap.
He also acknowledged that a conference-level, one-free-transfer rule might hold up against a price-fixing claim. Kessler said such a rule would be judged under a rule-of-reason review that looks at the conference's market power and its justification.
Timing is a problem. Kessler estimates that amending the settlement could take many months, possibly half a year, which would run past the January portal.
Opposition From the Left: The Labor Rights Critique
Peter Mills, Sen. Chris Murphy's legislative assistant on college sports from 2018 to 2025, told Sportico's Daniel Libit that the PCSA undermines athletes' collective bargaining rights by giving the NCAA antitrust exemptions. He says he advised Sen. Cantwell's staff (co-author of the bi-partisan bill written with Sen. Ted Cruz) not to compromise with Cruz, and he now believes they did: "They gave an antitrust exemption to one of the worst antitrust violators."
Murphy remains one of the bill's most vocal opponents. Murphy argues the bill protects the money coaches and executives by suppressing athlete compensation.
The House Is the Real Test
Kyle Saunders (Colorado State, Faculty Athletics Representative) puts the odds of enactment in this Congress at 30-40%. The House returns Nov. 9 for a contentious lame-duck session, and it is under pressure from both sides:
From the right: Many House Republicans consider a full ban on athlete employee status essential, as it was in the SCORE Act. Rep. Walberg and Sen. Husted have introduced a bill limiting international athletes to 20% of any varsity roster. Committee chairs Walberg and Guthrie, along with Majority Leader Scalise, criticized the bill earlier this year, and the revisions since then have not addressed their concerns.
From the left: The CBC and labor groups argue the antitrust protections would disproportionately limit earnings for minority athletes, especially in Southern states.
The math: Passing under suspension of the rules needs two-thirds, which gives the CBC the ability to block it. Passing under a regular rule requires replacing every Republican defection with a Democrat. Any House changes then send the bill back to the Senate.
Florida and FSU Angle
Florida's delegation is a real factor. Sens. Moody and Scott have repeatedly voted against advancing the bill after pressure from Florida schools over the conference realignment limits. Some House Republicans have followed them, and Rep. Patronis called it "a hot mess." Rep. Neal Dunn shared FSU's statement.
Dellenger notes that Florida, California, and the Carolinas together hold more than 100 House seats.
Bottom line
The Senate will very likely pass the bill Monday night, but House passage before Jan. 3 is roughly a one-in-three proposition.
Whatever Congress does, the compensation model is changing. The open question is whether that happens through the settlement, conference rules, or federal law, and each path has problems.
A conference-imposed hard cap without plaintiff and court approval faces a direct legal challenge in the absence of collective bargaining nor player representation. Transfer and agent rules at the conference level appear more defensible, but expect one or both to be tested after the fact.
For institution's purposes, stricter CSC review of school-affiliated NIL deals is the most immediate practical change. It affects how sponsor-backed deals get structured ahead of the January portal.
Stay tuned. We'll keep you posted.
Thanks for reading the Osceola. Subscribe now for 40 percent off to enjoy a full year of coverage of FSU athletics. You’ll also earn a $20 gift card at Alumni Hall.
